'Prisoner' reported to be less than 2-1/2 hours |
| Posted by: Lawless | | Posted by GRAE
Source: CTV.ca via The Leaky Cauldron
If you were hoping for a cinematic version of epic proportions for this year's Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban, you may be out of luck. According to Canadian television website CTV, the movie may be the shortest of the series so far.
Harry Potter fans who want to see every detail from the books translated into the screen versions might be uneasy over the projected length of Prisoner of Azkaban: less than 2½ hours, the shortest of the series so far.
This time, Rowling's story lent itself to a tighter script than the first two movies, said director Alfonso Cuaron, whose previous movie was the racy hit Y Tu Mama Tambien.
Keep in mind that the running time of Prisoner of Azkaban hasn't been officially confirmed by Warner Bros yet. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: agent mike | | I don't know. I think the previous two movies could have been better because during the adaptation process, alot of the better material was cut. I'm not bothered if this film is a bit shorter as long as the final edit includes the more important plot points and themes from the book. If it works, it'll show that it took Cuaron and his editors less time to do a better job than Chris Columbus. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: fuscia | | I agree with Mike. I hope that he tells the story and does not skip any important facts.
Mike- I am not buying what your sig. says. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: agent mike | |
| quote: |
fuscia said this in post #5 :
I agree with Mike. I hope that he tells the story and does not skip any important facts.
Mike- I am not buying what your sig. says. |
Some guy says it in the Adam Sandler film The Waterboy. It just makes me laugh.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: agent mike | | Ok, now I've changed it to a quote from Pinky and the Brain (quality cartoon). Anyhoo, back to the topic in question, I disagree with what that article implies (that a film can not be epic if its running time is under 2 1/2 hours). Gladiator ran for less than that and its one of the most epic films in modern cinema (of course it doesn't hold a candle to The Lord of the Rings). (Wow, I used four sets of brackets in this post). | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: gaboman | | i love pinky and the brain so cool
I liked the idea of having a 4 hour movie with intermission too bad eh?
I guess it'll work out okay though. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: fuscia | | Grant that is Goblet of Fire that will be 4 hours with an intermission.  | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: agent mike | | Just thought you guys might like to know that the internet movie database (www.imdb.com) has up on its POA page that the film's running time will be 135 minutes (2 1/4 hours). Let's hope they squeeze in all the necessary stuff without making it look like a squeeze. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: fuscia | | Well, at least it will be out soon. I wish it was going to be 3 hours though.  | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: HECK! | | IMDB.com says the run time is 136 minutes. Just over two hours.
-HECK! | | Reply To this Message
|
The Harry Potter Movies Forum: 'Prisoner' reported to be less than 2-1/2 hours
|