Observation - Attacks on Bush and the USA |
| Posted by: Edward Teach | | I wonder if you can help me understand this...
I've read a lot of the threads in the forum and have noticed that most if not all the anti-war folks seem to blast President Bush, the Government and the US in general with how much they hate our President and our country. They call us names and say how stupid we are. However the pro-war folks are not saying anything about Chirac, France, Schroeder, Germany, Putin and Russia. In fact even with Saddam it seems that the most we do is call him a brutal tyrant and call him bad.
There is a lot of space taken up with the anti-war folks trying as hard as they can to justify their side by bringing up things that the US has done in the past. I have not seen anyone mount a credible defence of Saddam or his regiem. Why is that?
Why? Because they can't defend Saddam.
They can't say that Saddam didn't have WMD.
They can't say that Saddam didn't use WMD.
They can't say that Saddam didn't continue to deceive the UN Weapons inspectors.
They can't say the he disarmed.
They can't say that he cared for his own people.
Maybe it's time for us pro-war folks to start digging up dirt on France, Germany and Russia. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Rambo | |
| quote: |
| Maybe it's time for us pro-war folks to start digging up dirt on France, Germany and Russia. |
Absolutely. Yes. That's why I started posting.... the sole intent being to unilaterally crap on the loser wimps of France and Germany as well as the infected cockroach lair of Russia and skank magnet China.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: GuyFromPakistan | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by goots
I wonder if you can help me understand this...
I've read a lot of the threads in the forum and have noticed that most if not all the anti-war folks seem to blast President Bush, the Government and the US in general with how much they hate our President and our country. They call us names and say how stupid we are. However the pro-war folks are not saying anything about Chirac, France, Schroeder, Germany, Putin and Russia. In fact even with Saddam it seems that the most we do is call him a brutal tyrant and call him bad.
There is a lot of space taken up with the anti-war folks trying as hard as they can to justify their side by bringing up things that the US has done in the past. I have not seen anyone mount a credible defence of Saddam or his regiem. Why is that?
Why? Because they can't defend Saddam.
They can't say that Saddam didn't have WMD.
They can't say that Saddam didn't use WMD.
They can't say that Saddam didn't continue to deceive the UN Weapons inspectors.
They can't say the he disarmed.
They can't say that he cared for his own people.
Maybe it's time for us pro-war folks to start digging up dirt on France, Germany and Russia. |
Nobody's defending Saddam because everyone knows he's a bad guy.
Most people are blasting Bush because they know that he's a bad guy.
Personally, I would have been more comfortable if only one of the above two was a bad guy.
Of all the above points there's only one that would give legitimacy to this war...does he have WMD?
I don't think so...show me the WMDs and I'll side with you...
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: GuyFromPakistan | | Another thing...
it's a matter of debate if the Bush administration's war against terrorism/saddam/axis of evil/american economy/UN legitimacy/International Law/civilians...etc is justified if Saddam does have WMD.
So before we draw conclusions, let's ask for proof...when we have the proof, let's go to the proper authority...when we go to the proper authority...let's act like human beings... | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: USA1 | | Wars and Battles are won and lost because of secrecy.
If the coalition discloses that WMD heve been found, it will open the door for Saddam to actualy use them. He would have nothing to lose because he doesn't care about killing his own people This will likely kill thousand of inocent people that he is using as shields. The "Use 'em or lose 'em" phylosphy applies in this case.
To protect the people and the coalition, you will not hear anything from the coalition unless it leaks out via the news media.
We don't know if they have been discovered or not.
We do know he has made them and has used them.
We do know he hasn't used them agianst the coalistion yet. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Edward Teach | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by GuyFromPakistan
Nobody's defending Saddam because everyone knows he's a bad guy.
Most people are blasting Bush because they know that he's a bad guy.
Personally, I would have been more comfortable if only one of the above two was a bad guy.
Of all the above points there's only one that would give legitimacy to this war...does he have WMD?
I don't think so...show me the WMDs and I'll side with you... |
If President Bush were so bad we would get rid of him. We the people of the US have the ability to Impeach then to remove a President. We impeached Clinton but didn't remove him. We also can vote in a different president in 2004. I and over 70% of Americans don't see Bush as bad. So it's a matter of perspective.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: NothingSacred | | Bush Sucks! Here's the comparison...
Economy
Bush - Downward Spiral
Clinton - Economic Boom
World Affairs
Bush - Blown to Pieces
Clinton - Time of Peace
Sex
Clinton - BJs in the oval office from Monica.
Bush - Bend over George the Neocons want to screw America. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Edward Teach | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by NothingSacred
Bush Sucks! Here's the comparison...
Economy
Bush - Downward Spiral
Clinton - Economic Boom
World Affairs
Bush - Blown to Pieces
Clinton - Time of Peace
Sex
Clinton - BJs in the oval office from Monica.
Bush - Bend over George the Neocons want to screw America. |
Brilliant this will solve the whole situation.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: usa47 | | I'm not sure I agree with the use them or lose them theory. Saddam cares nothing for the people in his country and because of his hate for the American people I don't think he would give using his WMD a second thought...if he has them. The question still is, "Does he in fact have them? " You are absolutely right, he's had them and used them in the PAST, but we are talking about WMDs that inspectors did not find in MONTHS. Surely, they couldn't be hid that good.
As for Saddam and Bush both being "bad guys", with that I will agree. No, I don't get all warm and fuzzy when I see Bush on television, I can't stand the man and YES I want him out of office. I believe Bush to be a warmonger and a power hungry little man who is willing to say and do anything to prove "his point" of view. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Edward Teach | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by usa47
I'm not sure I agree with the use them or lose them theory. Saddam cares nothing for the people in his country and because of his hate for the American people I don't think he would give using his WMD a second thought...if he has them. The question still is, "Does he in fact have them? " You are absolutely right, he's had them and used them in the PAST, but we are talking about WMDs that inspectors did not find in MONTHS. Surely, they couldn't be hid that good.
As for Saddam and Bush both being "bad guys", with that I will agree. No, I don't get all warm and fuzzy when I see Bush on television, I can't stand the man and YES I want him out of office. I believe Bush to be a warmonger and a power hungry little man who is willing to say and do anything to prove "his point" of view. |
Try finding something in the state of California when you have no idea where it is. I'll give you 100 people to help you look. Oh and by the way, when you get close, we'll move it. And if you ask us if we have it we'll say no. Oh yeah we'll let you ask for directions but only if we can hold a gun to the head of the person your asking.
The allies have found 3000+ chemical suits and Atropene self injector pens. Saddam knows that we don't us chemical weapons so why did they have it? Why did they have empty chemical tipped bombs/missiles? Why did they find an empty chemical manufacturing plant.....Hmmmmm? Why do they have intellengence of a line of death around Baghdad that when the allie troops cross the Iraqi troops have authorization to launch their Chemical Weapons that they don't have.... Hmmmm.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: BushFan | | Did you have to mention Clinton?....that sad sack of cow dung.
He really let our country go to the shits. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Edward Teach | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by BushFan
Did you have to mention Clinton?....that sad sack of cow dung.
He really let our country go to the shits. |
I didn't like him either but I respected his position. I even think his wife may be worse.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: usa47 | | Goots, you are quoting "speculation" as if all the "differing" and ever changing news reports are absolute law. Keep in mind the vast majority of what you are hearing and seeing is well geared through a receptive audience...this means you. Over 90% of what I've heard has been speculation to what our forces are doing and how Saddam's troops will respond. The only thing news reporters can do is get in the way and speculate. Frankly, I don't believe our troops should be spending time trying to protect the *?#$!* of news reporters who "never get it right" to start with. I put little faith in what I hear from the "Generals", the Pentagon, news media and not to mention Bush as to what is really going on in Iraq. You would be wise to do the same! | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: usa47 | | Dear Bushfan:
I would put the "sad sack of cow dung" up against that ferret faced lying manipulating ferret faced nitwit Georgie W. any day of the week and twice on Sunday. I would run no gallop to the polls to re-elect Clinton ALL over again. Many have vowed to make Bush a "one" term president and his little brother from Florida won't be able to screw the American people out of a legimate presidental election! | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: BushFan | | USA47, I think you should change it to Trader#1. You are really really really sad if you think gutless, spineless, nutless clinton was better suited to run this country. Your ass would be in a bomb shelter somewhere fighting to survive if that crap rag was still in charge. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: NothingSacred | | Hey Bush fan? Are you better off now, than you where 4 years ago?
Enough said! EVERYTHING SUCKS since Bush took over! EVERYTHING! | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Edward Teach | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by usa47
Goots, you are quoting "speculation" as if all the "differing" and ever changing news reports are absolute law. Keep in mind the vast majority of what you are hearing and seeing is well geared through a receptive audience...this means you. Over 90% of what I've heard has been speculation to what our forces are doing and how Saddam's troops will respond. The only thing news reporters can do is get in the way and speculate. Frankly, I don't believe our troops should be spending time trying to protect the *?#$!* of news reporters who "never get it right" to start with. I put little faith in what I hear from the "Generals", the Pentagon, news media and not to mention Bush as to what is really going on in Iraq. You would be wise to do the same! |
Every picture tells a story. Why do you think they have those inbedded media? I'm sure that the troops took the time and valuable space to bring all that stuff with them and set up a false display for the American media and audiance. Be serious now. Do you really think that?
It just shows you that when it's proven that Bush was correct that they will start with the "It was all set up, junk" and "It was all fabricated".
There's no conviencing some of you, so why try.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: BushFan | | Hey nothingsacred? yes i am better off now. As long as I live in the United States of America, i am better off!! President Bush didnt ceate your pestimistic attitude. Long Live President Bush! | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: NothingSacred | | No he didn't. All he did was ruin our economy, force us into an unneeded war, strip us of civil rights, ruin our relationship with many traditional allies, foster an atmosphere of corporate corruption...shall I go on?
It would have been better if Laura had caught him getting a blow job in the Oval Office instead!
When history looks back on Bush, he'll be considered one of the worse presidents ever. The odds will be better that we'll see Clinton's **** on Mt. Rushmore than Bush's head... | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Caps#1 | | you have got to be kidding me, if Clinton had done the right thing the first time we would not be at war right now, if clinton had not given away all of our secrets maybe we wouldn't have had to go to war now, you make me sick Nothingsacred, LONG LIVE BUSH | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: BushFan | | Hey nothingsacred, Just Leave! Thats all there is too it!! If you truely are that unhappy, if you feel as if you have been striped of your rights, why are you still here. Leave. Its that simple. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: brendy | | I agree with BushFan, why don't you move nothingsacred, you are not a true American. In your messages you dump on every thing about this country and most of th
e time make no serious claim at all. As for the comment made from Guyfrompakistan you said you woud join us if you saw WMD. Even though I hope we don't, I think with Saddam starting to get backed in a corner it might just happen. As sad as that might it ,if does happen, I expect you will be the first to post and say you were wrong. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: usa47 | | Bushfan, its obvious you are [AN INSULT] who thinks he is still trying to tame the WILD west. To avoid war makes you [INSULTED]? To seek alternative means to avoid death, destruction and a peaceful means of reaching resolution makes you spineless? You are an [INSULT] but more importantly you have no value for human life. Grow a Brain! | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: BushFan | | USA47 [UNECESSARY INSULT]. I never said avoiding war made you nutless and gutless. Walking away from it maybe? Running away while crying, you betcha! Turing your head away from it is a disgrace. Buy some more tissues. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: aluminum | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by NothingSacred
Bush Sucks! Here's the comparison...
Economy
Bush - Downward Spiral
Clinton - Economic Boom
World Affairs
Bush - Blown to Pieces
Clinton - Time of Peace
Sex
Clinton - BJs in the oval office from Monica.
Bush - Bend over George the Neocons want to screw America. |
You've been sadly misinformed, comrade.
Economy:
Clinton - Last year of term, economy was plummeting south like a meteor.
Bush - Working to restore economy after Clinton left it in shambles, and after the tragedy of Sept 11.
World Affairs:
Clinton - Sending financial aid to a country (N. Korea) that was using the money to build it's nuclear arsenal, all the while starving it's people. Responsible for the decline of our Central Intelligence Agency which left us vulnerable to the attacks of Sept 11. And lasty, selling military secrets to China for campaign contributions (treason).
Bush - Again, cleaning up after Clinton.
Sex:
Clinton - Average horny teenage boy in the body of a grown man.
Bush - Conducts himself in a manner that's fitting of the presidency, and unlike Clinton, practices some self control.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: aluminum | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by usa47
Bushfan, its obvious you are [AN INSULT] who thinks he is still trying to tame the WILD west. To avoid war makes you [INSULTED]? To seek alternative means to avoid death, destruction and a peaceful means of reaching resolution makes you spineless? You are [INSULTED] but more importantly you have no value for human life. Grow a Brain! |
Name calling and acting belligerent completely negates your entire argument.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Rambo | |
| quote: |
| Name calling and acting belligerent completely negates your entire argument. |
That is the arsenal of anti-coalitioner's when they can't handle reality.
Simply return it in kind, and in force, and all is well.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: MaChiNehead | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by Rambo
Absolutely. Yes. That's why I started posting.... the sole intent being to unilaterally crap on the loser wimps of France and Germany as well as the infected cockroach lair of Russia and skank magnet China. |
Ron Ackerman, great job as a moderator, very professional, both thumbs up LOL!
And congratulations on your fellow country-bashers, i see you got Rambo on your team, nice line-up!
I'm 100% sure you'll win EVERY war with a pro team like this one, way to go!
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Rambo | |
| quote: |
| Ron Ackerman, great job as a moderator |
No need to moderate, I speak the truth.
"wimps of France and Germany "
I do regard France and Germany as wimps and I am not alone on that, either.
"the infected cockroach lair of Russia"
Russia is a cockroach lair. A filthy and run down ghetto as far as I am concerned. I lived there almost two years so I speak from experience. I lived in Moscow, Irkutsk, and Ulan-Ude... and visited many other places in the interim, including St. Petersberg. Russia is a crap hole.
"skank magnet China"
I have been there, too, when I was living in Russia. I was there for almost a month along that of the Yellow Sea. The most vile and disgusting filth hole of rat sewage that I have ever seen... made Russia look like paradise almost.
There is nothing to moderate.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Sean Kelly | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by MaChiNehead
Ron Ackerman, great job as a moderator, very professional, both thumbs up LOL!
And congratulations on your fellow country-bashers, i see you got Rambo on your team, nice line-up!
I'm 100% sure you'll win EVERY war with a pro team like this one, way to go! |
It's not a moderator's job regulate popular opinion, nor sway opinions. What you quoted above from Rambo is a solid example of free spreech. If you think there are no such comments about Americans in this forum then you've overlooked an important aspect..
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Sean Kelly | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by Ron Ackerman
Try finding something in the state of California when you have no idea where it is. I'll give you 100 people to help you look. Oh and by the way, when you get close, we'll move it. And if you ask us if we have it we'll say no. Oh yeah we'll let you ask for directions but only if we can hold a gun to the head of the person your asking. |
haha - I've been living in California for 28 years and have spent that time looking for the perfect relaxation & vacation spot.. I still haven't found it. You probably can't fully appreciate the size of this place and the comparable square milage of Iraq without having done quite a bit of driving, walking, etc in such places.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Edward Teach | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by Sean Kelly
haha - I've been living in California for 28 years and have spent that time looking for the perfect relaxation & vacation spot.. I still haven't found it. You probably can't fully appreciate the size of this place and the comparable square milage of Iraq without having done quite a bit of driving, walking, etc in such places. |
3 years in Riverside
1 year in San Bernadino
3 years in Sacramento
Yeah I've been there.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: NothingSacred | | 1st on all, I've said nothing anti-American in any of my posts. I don't agree with the Bush Administration's ideology and world view- that's not anti-American. As a TRUE American, it's my duty to try and get the word out before the next election, so hopefully Bush can go back to his ranch and shovel his horse-dung there.
2ndly, it really is funny when I hear people say things have been better with Bush than they where with Clinton? And it's all because ole Billy got his willy waxed...that is funny.
Remember people, it's not un-American do disagree, It's un-American to be intolerant of disagreement...so wake up fascist Bushites...your ways aren't what George Washington fought for. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: aluminum | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by NothingSacred
2ndly, it really is funny when I hear people say things have been better with Bush than they where with Clinton? And it's all because ole Billy got his willy waxed...that is funny. |
That's not entirely accurate and you know it. Lets venture back into the presidency of the Clinton Administration:
Selling military technology to Communist China for campaign contributions (which I mentioned in another post). Information included satellite guidance technology and enough information for communist China to modernize their nuclear arsenal. Chinese missile weapon technology has greatly improved due to Clintons gift.
Clinton lawyer Vince Foster committed suicide under mysterious circumstances, his office was cleared out. Along with his office went the Whitewater billing records and several key pieces of evidence. Evidence that Clinton associate Bernard Nussbaum purposely delayed access to the office to investigators. Not to mention the mysterious suicide in which there is some hint that evidence was tampered with. Witnesses testified they saw Clinton aides clearing the supposedly sealed office. Years after evidence had disappeared from Vince Fosters office, subpoenaed Whitewater billing records appeared in the White House. In January of 1996 an aide stumbled across them sitting on a table in the White House. Hillary's finger prints were on them.
The Clintons were photographed on numerous occasions meeting with drug ringleader Jorge Cabrera at fundraiser events. Other Clinton donations came from a convicted illegal arms dealer, Chinese government agents, and many other drug smugglers. Photographs only reconfirm this.
Bill and Hillary Clinton left the Whitehouse with their pockets full - full of silverware, furniture, and pretty much everything else they could grab that wasn't theirs. Included was a multi thousand dollar furniture set belonging to the interior department, which the Clintons had tried to claim as a gift before being forced to return it.
The night before and morning of his departure from office, Bill Clinton made several controversial pardons. Aside from pardoning political allies and scandal co-conspirators such as Susan McDougal, Henry Cisneros, and his brother Roger, Bill pardoned fugitive criminal millionaire Marc Rich. Rich was charged with several felony offenses but fled to Switzerland to avoid facing trial. Among Rich's crimes were oil deals with Iran during the hostage crisis and ties to arms smuggling. The Rich pardon appears to be a political pay off and, though the president may constitutionally pardon anyone, it appears he abused his authority in a quid pro quo pardon in exchange for political donations. Clinton's pardon of Rich has prompted criticism from even the most liberal Clinton defenders and several prominent Democrats.
I won't even get into all the sex scandals, and Whitewater, because they're just way too obvious.
| | Reply To this Message
|
Post-9/11 Era Forum: Observation - Attacks on Bush and the USA
|