See This Picture And Thanks Mr. Bush And Blair - Post-9/11 Era

See This Picture And Thanks Mr. Bush And Blair

Post-9/11 Era Forum

Pages:  1Original Forum    Popular Forums    Search

Posted by: hodhod

<ADMIN EDIT>This link contains graphic content. PLEASE do NOT embed this material in your post. Submitting LINKS is fine - but embedding graphic images in the post is NOT.</ADMIN EDIT>

http://www.apple-zone.com/gallery/a...rpics/crime.jpg

Reply To this Message

Posted by: bellagirldee

That is jacked up ! but dont blame Dubyah.

If Saddam gave a damn about his people, and resigned , than it would not have come to that. Saddam is Satan, and now his people are paying the price for his bull crap (sad to say). War is not a pinic in the park people are gonna die.. that is reality.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: hodhod

bellagirldee,

if Saddam a Satan then I shall not be a Satan too and do worst than what Saddam is doing

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Retsep

Here is some more graphic content...this is what we're fighting for...see this and think NYC, LA, Chicago, Detroit, Atlanta, Boston, Philadelphia, etc

http://www.kdp.pp.se/chemical.html

We killed that civilian by accident. Saddam did this on purpose.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: RAF

Did you kill hundreds of thousands of civilian Japanese in Hiroshima and Nagasaki by accident too?

Reply To this Message

Posted by: hodhod

When this happened where were the ( WORLD PEACE SEEKERS ) and why the kept blind aye for almost 7 years.

And could you tell me who supplied the chemical weapon to IRAQ at that time ( 20 years ago )

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Retsep

First of all, I will address the Hiroshima thing. This attack was completely warranted. The alternative was to invade Japan, an attack that would have probably killed millions as opposed to hundereds of thousands of Japanese civilians. It was an end to the most horrific war in the history of mankind.

Now on to hodhod's comments. First of all we can all read regular fonts. That being said the chemical agents that were given to Iraq were given to fight the Iranians (because they were being funded by the communists). Not that that is a particularly great reason to proliferate such weapons. Just because the US gave chemical weapons to the Iraqi's does not justify their use against civilians. I don't understand why you don't see this as unacceptable.

Also, where were the "peace" protestors on March 18, 2003 ? I'll tell you, they were protesting FOR Saddam Hussein on the 15th anniversary of the chemical attacks against civilains.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: hodhod

Hmmmm “ does not justify their use against civilians” I have to agree with you
But can you justify why your government used it in (( Wacko Texas ))

Your government and Saddam are alike. But I have to be fair that your government is most horrible then Saddam. Look what you have done to Afghanistan CIVILIANS to Iraq CIVILIANS, Hiroshima CIVILIANS and so on ,, and to your own people as well, the highest execution rate in the word is in the US

Reply To this Message

Posted by: BushFan

hodhod, I think you could use a snort of that mustard gas.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Dreamzwalker

I've said it many times since people try to use THE BOMB as an excuse. The world was at war and the president did not take that decision lightly. Read his Journel. He hated giving that command and it haunted him for the rest of his life.
.
the pm of japan stated "if it wasn't for the dropping of the Nuclear bombs, japan would have suffered more loses then what occurred - we would have continued to fight to the death of all our people"
www.japantimes.com

You should read up on beliefs and materials before trying to play and feed off the Japan bombings.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Retsep

hodhod, first of all...the chemical agents that were used in Waco are completely different than those used by Saddam. One is lethal and the other is not (remember that David Koresh was responsible for setting his compound on fire, tear gas is not...that...flammable).

Also, how is the US government and the Iraqi government at all similar? Seriously they are not even close. In one, people are free to express themselves (even speak out against the war), in the other they are murdered if they don't act a certain way.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Dreamzwalker

And in Iraq - if michael moore was an Iraqi - hewould be dead if he said that about his country. Probably shot on-stage.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: edmund

quote:
Originally posted by hodhod
When this happened where were the ( WORLD PEACE SEEKERS ) and why the kept blind aye for almost 7 years.

And could you tell me who supplied the chemical weapon to IRAQ at that time ( 20 years ago )



Just to let you know we gave the chemicals an Iraqi collage. Saddam had his people take the chemicals from the collage and turned them in to weapons and then used it.

and since it is partly are fault don't you think we should fix it!
Reply To this Message

Posted by: Rambo

hodhod,

I just thought of another good book to add to your already actively growing collection:

"hodhod: Undeniable Proof that Sniffing Glue is Bad"

Reply To this Message

Posted by: hodhod

Doesn’t matter what kind of chemical agents were used, the result is the same

“David Koresh was responsible for setting his compound on fire” this what your government said. If this is the case then why McVeigh bombed the government building in Oklahoma

Do you know that your government killed many innocents people then any dictator in the world

And can you tell me what happened to Martin Luther King Jr and Malcolm X

Who assassinated them ?????????

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Retsep

Martin Luther King and Malcom X were both assassinated by racists. Their murders, while tragic, have NOTHING to do with this war. For that matter neither does Waco, but since you got me going here comes.

The "difference" between the chemical agents used by the ATF/FBI in Waco and what Saddam Hussien used in Halabja 3/18/1988 is enormous. The fact of the matter is that it does matter. It's the difference between shooting someone with rubber bullets and real ones.

What was done at Halabja was completely unjustified. What was done at Waco was in accordance with US laws. The Branch Dividians had illegal weapons, a search warrant was issued for their compound and when that search warrant was acted on 4 ATF agents were shot. Then David Koresh, and his followers, burned down their compund as the law enforcement officers attempted to route them out. There was no conspiracy here, it was plain and simple. Fires began nearly simultaneously at multiple locations on the compound there was only 1 tank punching holes in the walls when this happened...the tank never fired on the compund, therefore the only way for those fires to have been started was by the Branch Dividians.

I suggest you check out http://www.kdp.pp.se/chemical.html to see what Saddam Hussein did to civilians. This was not done in war time, he did this to his own people for no apparent reason. If you think this is acceptable then please say so. Don't bring up unrelated events that have no bearing on this like the MLK assassination. I have found that when the peace nuts get backed into a corner, they like to bring up every single questionable thing done by the US over the past 200 years. Stick with the issues people.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Hitman

quote:
Originally posted by RAF
Did you kill hundreds of thousands of civilian Japanese in Hiroshima and Nagasaki by accident too?


Hey The japs brought the states into ww2 by bombing pearl harbour

Until then they kept out of ww2
Reply To this Message

Posted by: Rambo

quote:
I have found that when the peace nuts get backed into a corner, they like to bring up every single questionable thing done by the US over the past 200 years.


Very well said. That is absolutely correct.
Reply To this Message

Pages:  1 Free Forums    Chat Forum

Post-9/11 Era Forum: See This Picture And Thanks Mr. Bush And Blair

Forum Forum Forum