THE WHOLE HISTORY OF jews AND ISRAEL AND PALESTINE |
| Posted by: Truthful | | How did Israel come to belong to Britain in the first place? It seems that there were some secret pacts being made between Britain and the Jews to give the Jews land in the heart of Arabia for which they could rule in the name of the Kingdom of David (peace be upon him) and exert its influence over the whole of Arabia and the world. Israel was created in the name of the United Nations. What is amazing is who granted the UN the power to create a new country in the world? The establishment of countries is a historical heritage which has continued on its own.
The only authority of the UN should have been applied to those countries which had joined it. There was not a world mandate that said that everyone had to accept the UN's authority whether it joined or not. There was neither any mandate which stated the UN had the right to create a country at it's own discretion. This is what role the UN had to play in creating Israel.
Regarding the UN of today. Every time the UN passes a strongly worded resolution against the heinous crimes committed by the Israeli's the US always veto's it. Israeli's have butchered babies yet the world has failed to take notice. The is against justice to a great extent.
The question then arises that why does the UN deserve its name when only 5 nations have veto power? Even if world opinion is united, one of those 5 nations has the right to reject that opinion. The US has been veto'ing justice for many years in regards to Israel.
Regarding the creation of Israel:
In 1897 a council of Jews was established to achieve its Zionist objective. It consisted of a part that believed in the Kingdom of David (AS) which, according to them, they would establish one day. They are known as Israeli's or Zionists.
During the time a Jewish document came which was called the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. Zion is the name of the mountain on which David (AS) was promised the Kingdom. This was a scheme of the top leader of Israel, who believed in Zionism, as to how they shall dominate the world, what mode of action shall be adopted for this purpose, what will be the work principles and objectives, what means will be adopted, etc.
This document was discoverd by a secretery working under the Elders of Zion. To kill time she picked up the manuscript and read it. She became so shocked upon reading through the whole scheme to conquer the world that she smuggled it to Russia where it was published in 1905.
Around the same time they hatched a secret plan and on the other hand revealed a more apparrent programme, the latter being the subject of no controversy or dispute. The Jews assert that it is true that they had a programme of action which was made public, and it consisted of promoting their influence on the relations between various governments with the objective of achieving Israel as a seperate and independent homeland.
The second plan envisaged a "United Nations" (although the UN did not exist at the time, nor the league of Nations, but this plan contains all the ingredients) and after the description the plan expresses the hope that following the achievements and realizing the goal of establishing a UN, the Jews would then acquire control over the UN and exercise, through it, their dominion over the whole world. The plan calling for capturing the UN as an instrument to rule the world was bound to take considerable time as it did. However, all the intermediate steps forseen in their plan caem to pass as mentioned in the plan.
The Jews absolved themselves of this plan and maintained it was just attributed to them. The learned observers, politicians and intellegentsia debated this claim around the world. It led to litigation in several courts. A protestant from Britain has published a well documented book entitled "Water Flowing Eastward" which discussed the aspects of this plan. This book mentioned that the Jews lifted it off the market immediately. Regardless if the Jews did it or not, it does appear to have dissapeared from the market. You can see for yourself if you'd like.
The author of the book mentions that when a Western politician was asked if the manuscript attributed to the Jews is in fact authored by Jewish leaders or is just a conspiracy against the Jews and attempt to malign them. The politician responded that there are only 2 possibilities: 1)either this plan was drawn up by those whom it was attributed to- for all subsequent events have transpired in accord with this plan and could not have occurred in the same order foretold in this plan, or 2)that this is a revealed book of a prophet of God who gained the prior knowledge from the Divine and thus prophesied!
Frightful era of Dreadful Conspiracies Against Islam:
In 1916, Mr. McMahon who represented the British Government wrote a letter to Sherrif Husseing of Mecca and Medina who was then Governor of Hijaz. This letter can be summarized as proposing that if you agree upon showing us some favors, then, as a reward for those services, we will help you get rid of the tyrannical government of Turkey and set up an independent Arab state. The favors consisted of some areas of a map being marked as A and the others as B, in other words, designating some of them as areas of English-dominion and others as French-dominion.
Briefly, those conditions meant that, if accepted, the agreement would empower the British and the French, in their respective spheres of influence thus carved out, to be solely responsible for formulating foreign policy. Hijaz will be bound to conduct its external affairs only with the approval and permission of the respective governments of Britain and France, depending on whose territorial influence the affair belonged. So much so, that they would not be allowed to invite any European observer or advisor unless permitted by the British in their sphere of influence or the French in their sphere of domination.
While these parleys with the sheriff of Mecca were still in progress there was a conspiracy simultaneously brewing with the Saudi dynasty, i.e, the leader of the Wahabi sect, that if they agree to accept British hegemony in this area permanently and agree to the formation of foreign policy with the consent of the British government-as well as several other conditions-then the British government would install its power in the land of Hijaz and would permanently protect them against any possible aggression. With this agreement in place, a pre-planned atack was launched within a few years and the Sheriff of Mecca was ousted.
So in the period 1915-1917, on the one hand the Sheriff of Mecca was getting one signal and so also were his opponents. On the other hand Russia, Britain, and France entered into a tripartite agreement to divide the Ottoman empire and designate the areas so divided which were to be occupied by the Russians, the British, and the French, respectively. In addition to that, there was another Anglo-French agreement to divide and gobble up Arab lands. Therefore, under this plan that part of the world came under the dominion of 3 super powers. Russian influence in Arab lands was not provided for in these plans. Arab lands were agreed to be subjected to an Anglo-French monopoly. The subsequent wars and the role played by these 2 nations in this area is easy to understand in retrospect.
The Mystery: The Richest Land but the Most Poorly Defended:
Now, when we analyze the current situation from this perspective, various motives and objectives become clear. Before advancing any further, we should touch on an issue that is deeply connected to these issues. One would not expect two things to happen but they did happen. For one thing, the Middle East is the richest part of the globe and 60% of the world oil productions comes from there, but in spite of that, it is the weakest in regards to its own self-defense. It is also weakest in industrial growth. What is the puzzle, what is the mystery? Why is it that there is no guard standing over the mountains of these riches?
In this part of the world there is literally mountains of gold accumulating and despite that, from the military point of view, there is a vacuum in this area. Whatever defense capability you are seeing now, it bears no relation to the wealth that is located there. Why is that so? Why has this part been as a weakling, whereas Israel, which is a minor part of the area and not endowed with oil, has been bolstered up to an unusually strong position? So to say, the enclosure of wealth is defenceless and the quarter from where burglary is expected has been beefed up! This is a puzzle which needs to be resolved.
The Background to the Palestinian Issue:
In 1917, Lord Balfour made some committments with the Jews. Later , in 1920 a surprising incident occurren on the political scene. The League of Nations gave a mandate to the British government to assume the role of the caretaker in Palestinian territory. This mandate included a specific provision that whatever promise Balfour had made with the Jews for the creation of a Zionist state shall be honoured by the British government. Paul Harper in his book, The Arab-Israeli Issue (1986), writes
"In 1920, at the League of Nations Supreme Council meeting in Sane Remo, Britain was assigned the mandate for Palestine, which carried with it the obligation to implement the Balfour Declaration."(Pages 32-33)
This was a display of highhandedness and injustice by this organization that is unprecedented in the history of the world. It was clearly the result of a conspiracy of the big powers. The League of Nations was designed to be a representative body of all nations of the world, watching their interests with impartiality. It had no jurisdictions to delegate such mandatory powers to anybody. A British Minister wrote a letter to Lord Rothschild, a distinguished banker belonging to a Jewish family of France, that the British cabinet was contemplating the enforcement of a decision in compliance with the mandate passed by the League of Nations. The question becomes, who invested such authority to the League of Nations to dispose of the fate of a nation in this manner, and then authorize the same country, which had made a promise to the Jews, to go ahead and enforce its will in whatever manner it liked. During the course of further research, it comes to light that the League of Nations mandate system was devised as a means for developed countries to guide non-developed countries to independence and self-government. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Truthful | | That was the philosophy behind the mandate system. Lord Balfour was aware of this but he intentionally contravened its aim. In this regard he was a man who performed a most sinister role. In order to bypass the mandate system he wrote a secret memorandum to the British Cabinet, which has been included in Paul Harper's book, The Arab-Israeli Issue. Lord Balfour stated:
"In Palestine we do not propose even to go through the form of consulting the wishes of the present inhabitants of the country...the Zionism, be it right or wrong, good or bad, is ... of far profounder import than the desires and prejudices of the 700,000 Arabs who now inhabit this ancient land"(Page 33).
In regards to the early migration of Jews to Palestine, there are conflicting reports, Paul Harper writes:
"At the end of the First world War, after 32 years of concentrated efforts 56,000 Jews, according to the British Census of 1918 had been settled in Palestine on some 2 per cent of its land area. British rule was the opportunity for the Zionist movement to turn what was still a dream into a reality" (Page 33)
"By 1929 there were 156,000 immigrants (Jews) owning 4 percent of the total area of Palestine, but 14 percent of its cultivatable land" (page 35).
After 1929 and until 1948 when the Mandate came to an end there was a rapid increase in the migration of Jews to Palestine. In 1947 when the UN announced the partition of Palestine, thus creating the State of Israel, the population of the Jews had increased from 85,000 in 1919 to a phenomenal 700,000 in 1947!
On May 17, 1939, prior to the beginning of World War 2, the British government published a White Paper that spelled a change in foreign policy. At that time Mr. Chamberlain was heading the British Government. He expressed his opinion that the world was standing at the brink of a second World War. At that crucial juncture if the British government had decided to go against the Jews and incur their enmity or decide against the large Muslim community and antagonize them, this his advise would be to favor the Muslims. Note, that the earlier British decision in this regard was taken soon after World War 1, and the 2nd British stance was expressed, as noted above, just before World War 2. It was felt that the earlier decision by the British was based merely on political expediency, and so it was not realistic. In pursuance of this decision the British government formally announced that it does not favor establishing a Jewish state in Palestine and that it does not accept the right of Jews that they should have a separate state in that area.
Had teh British been honest in their intentions they should have surrendered that Mandate to the League of Nations for the simple reason that this Mandate was assigned to Britain under conditions that prevailed in 1917, but now, in the present circumstances it was an outdated document. In this way their Mandate would have become obsolete. But again in 1946, as the war ended, they changed their mind on the decision taken before the war and permitted the quota of 100,000 Jews to be settled in Palestine. By 1947, i.e., towards the end of the period for which this Mandate was valid, the UN announced a plan according to which Palestine was to be partitioned into 2 separate states for Jews and Muslim Arabs. By this time the Jewish population had swollen to 700,000 as against the Arab population of 2 million depicting a ratio of 1:3. Looking at the original Mandate of 85,000 one wonders how did it rise to 700,000! Further research reveals that Jews were secretly smuggled into Palestine, in large numbers. Whenever the British tried to stop the influx of Jews, the Jews rioted and rebelled against the British authorities, threatening retaliatory actions. So the inflow of Jews into Palestine continued unchecked until it reached a ration of 7:20. Later the UN met to decide how much territory would be given to the Jews and how much to the Arab Muslims, by partitioning the country. Even in this matter they favored the Jews by deciding the Jews get 56% of the area of Palestine and 44% to the Arab Muslims. They further decided that the City of Jerusalem which was located on the Arab side be under international supervision, arguing that it contained the holy places equally sacred to Jews, Christians, and Muslims.
Whatever insignificant area was left behind would be given to Arab Muslims but it was not. The resolution also had a provision that, prior to the formation of governments of the 2 groups in their respective area, the British government would continue to cooperate and coordinate with the UN and its nominated committees for implementing this plan. But in effect, the British government refused to cooperate in this matter. Unfortunately, there was no one to organise the Muslims. This led to complete chaos and disorder among the Arab community for there was no competent Muslim organization to help them form that Muslim government.
When this mandate came to an end in 1948, the hurried manner in which the British government relinquished control and abandoned the area, is unprecedented. When they left India, they had ensured that a clear-cut line of demarcation separated the 2 newly created countries, and legitimate governments took charge. The British government neither took any such precaution till the final day of their stay in Palestine, nor did it let the UN do it. They packed up and everything they had in Palestine by 11:30 am and their ships left the Palestinian waters at 12 pm that day. This is how they abandoned that country. It was an act of cruelty towards the Palestinians who suffered abandonment amid the chaos.
As for the Jews, they had 2 established organizations capable of safeguarding their interests. One of them was working under the command of Manachem Begin which was initially designed to be a strong terrorist group set up well before 1948, to carry out terrorist activities against the Arabs, when necessary, even against the British. The second organization was operating under the leadership of David Ben Gurion. The Jews received large supplies of arms from US sources, on an ongoing basis. This set up was further divided into 3 or 4 sub-organizations whose aim, besides establishing an effective government, was to not only defend their own territory but grab more territory from the Arabs. So for a period of 1.5 years (1948-1949), skirmishes between the Arabs and the Jews continued in which some neighboring Arab states also participated. Although these states were assisting the Palestinian Muslims but no formal declaration of war was made against Israel by any Muslim country. Generally this limited their participation to extending a helping hand to the distressed Arabs living in Palestine. With the cessation of hostilities in 1948 a truce was reached to maintain peace in the region, the Jews had succeeded in occupying 75% of the Palestinian land as against their original allocation of 56%. This provides a fairly clear picture of the conduct of the UN and the behavior of the British government and its ally, US, who kept watching these developments as silent spectators much to the disadvantage of Arabs.
The essence in this case is that a conspiracy of the Western powers, in which the defunct League of Nations and subsequently its successor, the UN actively participated and the government of Britain and the US played a pivotal role, resulted in the emergence of a Jewish state in Palestine which no standard of Justice, International Law, or the Charter of the UN would have sanctioned. They could not have moved a step towards the creation of Israel without the active connivance of these great powers. Anyhow, the fateful decision was taken and, ever since, this region has been a scene of armed conflicts and a hot bed of international intrigues.
(All information was taken from the book, THE GULF CRISIS & THE NEW WORLD ORDER by Hazrat Mirza Tahir Ahmad published in 1992. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Truthful | | I shall continue on about the horrible atrocities committed by Israeli's in the name of "defense".
I would also like to say that there are plenty of just-minded fair Jews out there who opposed the creation of Israel. I am in no way condemning Jews in totality. It is only for those of Israel. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Merkava | | So what you're pretty much saying, is that Jews arrived from Eastern Europe and Russia in the 1880s, either fleeing oppression or following the Zionist dream. And Arabs from neighboring countries flocked to jobs created by Jewish immigrants.
Then, In 1917, Britain issued the Balfour Declaration and promised "the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish People."
The British then turned around and gave over 77 percent of Palestine to the Arab Hashemites, for what later became Jordan. The remaining 23 percent, west of the River Jordan, was supposedly for the Jews.
But in 1947, the UN voted to partition that 23 percent of Palestine into Jewish and Arab states. The Israelis accepted the plan and in 1948 proclaimed the establishment of their state. Neighboring Arab nations, however, rejected both the partition and the idea of a Jewish state and launched a massive invasion of Israel.
Makes sense to me! | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Truthful | | A "massive invasion"? How did it come to that? You could only say that it was a massive invasion if the neighboring countries then tried to destroy it. I have laid bare your deceit, you cannot hide behind the cover of ignorance no more. The only reason that land was created was because the Jews conspired with the British- while the British double-dealed the Arabs. The Khalifa of the Ahmadiyya Muslim community has laid it all bare for the world to take notice. My hand is sore from all the typing, so I shall next describe the hostilities by Israel later on. God-willing, the curse will be on the liars.
Merkava do you think that the opposition that you faced in this site is mild? You will never defeat me in an argument. Those same facts that you twist I shall lay bare for all those who read to judge the truth for themselves. Surely, truth has become manifest from falsehood. Bring forth your next fallacious argument. In fact, why don't you tell us about those Jewish terrorist groups that carried out terrorist acts against the British when they didn't get something done their way. Why don't you describe those Jewish fundamentalists that blew up buildings, that murdered pregnant women, that butchered children? Feel free to display your arrogance, the plan of the Jews will never succeed. Those Jews that control any portion of Palestine will fall, not to any physical weapon, but to the weapon of our supplications to God. God-willing, the curse be on the liars- whoever they may be!
Let me continue to harp on this point.
In Paul Harper's book, The Arab-Israeli Issue. Lord Balfour stated:
"In Palestine we do not propose even to go through the form of consulting the wishes of the present inhabitants of the country...the Zionism, be it right or wrong, good or bad, is ... of far profounder import than the desires and prejudices of the 700,000 Arabs who now inhabit this ancient land"(Page 33).
In Paul Harper's book, The Arab-Israeli Issue. Lord Balfour stated:
"In Palestine we do not propose even to go through the form of consulting the wishes of the present inhabitants of the country...the Zionism, be it right or wrong, good or bad, is ... of far profounder import than the desires and prejudices of the 700,000 Arabs who now inhabit this ancient land"(Page 33).
In Paul Harper's book, The Arab-Israeli Issue. Lord Balfour stated:
"In Palestine we do not propose even to go through the form of consulting the wishes of the present inhabitants of the country...the Zionism, be it right or wrong, good or bad, is ... of far profounder import than the desires and prejudices of the 700,000 Arabs who now inhabit this ancient land"(Page 33). | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Merkava | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by Truthful
A "massive invasion"? How did it come to that? You could only say that it was a massive invasion if the neighboring countries then tried to destroy it. |
**News flash**
They did. Three times. Failed each attempt. 1948 - 1967 - 1973.
That last one was on the the Holiest day in Judaism too - Yom Kippur. Can you imagine how whiney and moany the Muslims would be if Israel ever DARED to do anything on Ramadan?
| quote: |
Originally posted by Truthful
I have laid bare your deceit, you cannot hide behind the cover of ignorance no more. The only reason that land was created was because the Jews conspired with the British- while the British double-dealed the Arabs. The Khalifa of the Ahmadiyya Muslim community has laid it all bare for the world to take notice. My hand is sore from all the typing, so I shall next describe the hostilities by Israel later on. God-willing, the curse will be on the liars. |
So the British created Israel because the Jews control the British? Is that the latest conspiracy?
| quote: |
Originally posted by Truthful
Merkava do you think that the opposition that you faced in this site is mild? You will never defeat me in an argument. |
We'll let the Audience decide that. Anyways, you've still got some excuses to make in that Six Day war thread.
| quote: |
Originally posted by Truthful
In fact, why don't you tell us about those Jewish terrorist groups that carried out terrorist acts against the British when they didn't get something done their way. Why don't you describe those Jewish fundamentalists that blew up buildings, that murdered pregnant women, that butchered children? |
Murdering pregnant women and children is simply Arab Propaganda....as for Blowing up buildings - there is some truth to this - but let me explain what happened rather than let you label it as "terrorism"
The Irgun had bombed the King David hotel in 1946 after British troops invaded the Jewish Agency and confiscated large amounts of documents. At the same time, 3,000 Jews were placed under British arrest.
A week later, news of a massacre of 40 Jews in a pogrom in Poland reminded the Jews of Palestine how Britain's restrictive immigration policy had condemned thousands to death.
Irgun leader Menachem Begin stressed his desire to avoid civilian casualties. In fact, the plan was to warn the British so they would evacuate the building before it was blown up. Three telephone calls were placed, one to the hotel, another to the French Consulate, and a third to the Palestine Post, warning that explosives in the King David Hotel would soon be detonated.(How many Palestinian terrorists WARN before an attack, Mr 'Truthful'??)
On July 22, 1946, the calls were made. The call into the hotel was apparently received and ignored. Begin quotes one British official who supposedly refused to evacuate the building, saying: "We don't take orders from the Jews."42 As a result, when the bombs exploded, the casualty toll was high: a total of 91 killed and 45 injured. Among the casualties were 15 Jews. Few people in the hotel proper were injured by the blast.
In contrast to Arab attacks against Jews, which were widely hailed by Arab leaders as heroic actions, the Jewish National Council denounced the bombing of the King David.
For decades the British denied they had been warned. In 1979, however, a member of the British Parliament introduced evidence that the Irgun had indeed issued the warning. He offered the testimony of a British officer who heard other officers in the King David Hotel bar joking about a Zionist threat to the headquarters. The officer who overheard the conversation immediately left the hotel and survived.
| quote: |
Originally posted by Truthful
Feel free to display your arrogance, the plan of the Jews will never succeed. Those Jews that control any portion of Palestine will fall, not to any physical weapon, but to the weapon of our supplications to God. God-willing, the curse be on the liars- whoever they may be! |
| quote: |
Originally posted by Truthful
Let me continue to harp on this point.
In Paul Harper's book, The Arab-Israeli Issue. Lord Balfour stated:
"In Palestine we do not propose even to go through the form of consulting the wishes of the present inhabitants of the country...the Zionism, be it right or wrong, good or bad, is ... of far profounder import than the desires and prejudices of the 700,000 Arabs who now inhabit this ancient land"(Page 33). |
That's great. Now tell me, what went in between the "...".s ? Also, You ARE aware that Lord Balfour had no authority to decide what would happen to Palestine. Only the British Government did.
Now, lets get something more official on here, shall we?
| quote: |
Foreign Office
November 2nd, 1917
Dear Lord Rothschild,
I have much pleasure in conveying to you, on behalf of His Majesty's Government, the following declaration of sympathy with Jewish Zionist aspirations which has been submitted to, and approved by, the Cabinet.
"His Majesty's Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country."
I should be grateful if you would bring this declaration to the knowledge of the Zionist Federation.
Yours sincerely,
Arthur James Balfour |
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Truthful | | Go look at my other thread regarding Jewish terrorism. Try to rationalize Meachem Begin. I will continue this topic after finals. Unless you say something really outrageous. Of course, that plan for Jewish world domination is going exactly as planned although "it has been debunked many times". What do you have to say about that. Of course, you can contrinue to put a spin on everything. What doesn't make sense is the fact that the British first said they weren't gonna create an Israel before WW2 then decided to create one after. You don't call that a collaboration with the Jews/Zionists? You are not denything those things obviously. Of course you can't take a Zionist at their word. For their so-called wars of defense they have captured more land everytime. Don't you worry, I won't ever stop coming at you. Your in for it. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Merkava | | Yes, the British were intriguied to create a Home for the Jews after Six million of them were slaughtered during WW2. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Truthful | | Yes they were intrigued to create a home for them after they were slaughtered, but why create it in the middle of Arabian lands? I have already told you that Germany was under the control of Britain and the US, so the Jews were protected! Where is the fairness of creating a land for the Jews come from? Just as many Russian were killed in WW2. Just as many Africans die of hunger every year. I place values on human lives not just Jewish lives. Get out of your biased and prejudiced thinking. The Jews deserved a land to call their own? Why did it happen to be in the Kingdom of David? Who is so naive as to think that the Jews and the Brits did not conspire. I think you have agreed to this fact as well! Who gave the UN the right to create a country without the permission of those dwelling there? Who gave the right to the Jews to have their own country when they escaped to Muslim ruled Palestine anyhow to escape the treacherous Christians in ages past. Muslims have NEVER committed crimes against any religious denomination. They have had quarrels from amongst their own sects, but they have never murdered en masse in the name of religion! Jews were free to come and go in Palestine as they liked? Why would they displace all those Palestinian Muslim's for the Jews? What kind of justice is this? God's curse be on the liars. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Merkava | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by Truthful
Yes they were intrigued to create a home for them after they were slaughtered, but why create it in the middle of Arabian lands? I have already told you that Germany was under the control of Britain and the US, so the Jews were protected! Where is the fairness of creating a land for the Jews come from? Just as many Russian were killed in WW2. Just as many Africans die of hunger every year. I place values on human lives not just Jewish lives. Get out of your biased and prejudiced thinking. The Jews deserved a land to call their own? Why did it happen to be in the Kingdom of David? Who is so naive as to think that the Jews and the Brits did not conspire. I think you have agreed to this fact as well! Who gave the UN the right to create a country without the permission of those dwelling there? Who gave the right to the Jews to have their own country when they escaped to Muslim ruled Palestine anyhow to escape the treacherous Christians in ages past. Muslims have NEVER committed crimes against any religious denomination. They have had quarrels from amongst their own sects, but they have never murdered en masse in the name of religion! Jews were free to come and go in Palestine as they liked? Why would they displace all those Palestinian Muslim's for the Jews? What kind of justice is this? God's curse be on the liars. |
Why Israel? Because the Jews felt it was the only place they could call home - after all - it did belong to them first. The Muslims seem to think that because they controlled the area for a certain point in History they have unlimited claim to it despite their inability to defend it.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Truthful | | Now the pieces are falling off! Your wheels of deception have started to roll! The Muslims couldn't defend it so that is the reason the Jews had it handed to them! So your saying that when Muslim countries get their defenses then it will be hell to pay for Israel, right? So it would then be just for the Muslims to attack the Israel and drive the Zionists out, correct?
So it belonged to them first? That was 2000 years ago. We are talking about present-day. The composition of that area was all Arabs, until Jews were smuggled in illegally. What do you have to say to that?
Also, I think that people can read without you quoting them. But do whatever floats your boat! I think I have you on the ropes now. This is a fun game of chess, too bad you were at such a disadvantage. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Truthful | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by Merkava
Why Israel? Because the Jews felt it was the only place they could call home - after all - it did belong to them first. The Muslims seem to think that because they controlled the area for a certain point in History they have unlimited claim to it despite their inability to defend it. |
Ah, what a quote! Now this absolutely shatters all of your arguments! Were you not thinking when you said this? All Muslim battles against Israel are now completely justified according to your own view!!! Hopefully, you have started to question yourself. God-willing you will realize the truth in the matter. God's curse be on the liars.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Merkava | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by Truthful
Now the pieces are falling off! Your wheels of deception have started to roll! The Muslims couldn't defend it so that is the reason the Jews had it handed to them! So your saying that when Muslim countries get their defenses then it will be hell to pay for Israel, right? So it would then be just for the Muslims to attack the Israel and drive the Zionists out, correct? |
The ottoman empire lost claim to the land, and its new conqueres decided to split it into a part Arab, Part Jewish community. The arabs didnt accept this, claimed war on the Jews, and lost!
| quote: |
Originally posted by Truthful
So it belonged to them first? That was 2000 years ago. We are talking about present-day. The composition of that area was all Arabs, until Jews were smuggled in illegally. What do you have to say to that? |
This was 50 years ago! Are you suggesting the Transfer of Six million Jews out of Israel? Those "illegally smuggled" Jews were running from the Persecuation of Europe and the anti-Jewish economic legislation in Poland.
Now explain this to me - why was Jewish immigration illegal, whereas Arab immigration (which was just as high as the Jewish one) was perfectly Legal ?
The Jewish population increased by 470,000 between World War I and World War II, while the non-Jewish population rose by 588,000.13 In fact, the permanent Arab population increased 120 percent between 1922 and 1947.
This rapid growth was a result of several factors. One was immigration from neighboring states — constituting 37 percent of the total immigration to pre-state Israel — by Arabs who wanted to take advantage of the higher standard of living the Jews had made possible.15 The Arab population also grew because of the improved living conditions created by the Jews as they drained malarial swamps and brought improved sanitation and health care to the region. Thus, for example, the Muslim infant mortality rate fell from 201 per thousand in 1925 to 94 per thousand in 1945 and life expectancy rose from 37 years in 1926 to 49 in 1943.
The Arab population increased the most in cities where large Jewish populations had created new economic opportunities. From 1922-1947, the non-Jewish population increased 290 percent in Haifa, 131 percent in Jerusalem and 158 percent in Jaffa. The growth in Arab towns was more modest: 42 percent in Nablus, 78 percent in Jenin and 37 percent in Bethlehem.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Truthful | | Jewish immigration was illegal because it was ILLEGAL! Are Jews above the law? What right did they have to smuggle themselves in? Obviously, they weren't getting smuggled in too help out Palestinians, CUZ NOW THEY'VE GOT THEIR OWN LAND! Obviously, the Jewish immigration didn't have totally pure motive did it? I don't care about the Jews anyhow. Whatever plans they plot are bound to fail. Anyhow, your defeat is in my signature. Arabs have the right to defend their land according to yourself! As I have already stated, Jews always found sanctuary in Muslim-ruled Palestine. Why do they continue to oppress the Arabs of that region? Are the Jews planning on attacking the rich Arab countries and taking control of the world's oil? Are the Jews planning on controlling the world's oil supply, get rich, and further develop theiri nuclear program? These are all parts of the Jewish conspiracy, beware lest it come to pass.
I see right through your fallacious arguments as if the falsehoods are blinking, continue on, if you have the determination. You've already broken anyhow.
CHECK OUT MERKAVA'S DEFEAT IN MY SIGNATURE!!!! | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Merkava | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by Truthful
Jewish immigration was illegal because it was ILLEGAL! Are Jews above the law? |
No, but it seemed the Arabs were.
| quote: |
Originally posted by Truthful
Anyhow, your defeat is in my signature. Arabs have the right to defend their land according to yourself! |
There is one big difference you are missing, The Jews were in Israel before Islam even existed.
The Arabs have the right to do whatever they want - aslong as they are willing to face the consequence of war.
Youre only making a fool of yourself by putting it in your signature...keep up the good work.
| quote: |
Originally posted by Truthful
As I have already stated, Jews always found sanctuary in Muslim-ruled Palestine. Why do they continue to oppress the Arabs of that region? |
They have always found sanctuary in Palestine? That's really funny!
Have you ever heard of the Hebron Massacre of 1929?
http://www.us-israel.org/jsource/History/hebron29.html
Unlike ALL OF THE OTHER ARAB COUNTRIES, Israel allows Arab/Muslim citizens. They also give them full rights, and even a representative in the knesset.
Jews arent even allowed to own land in most Arab countries!
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Truthful and taking control of the world's oil? Are the Jews planning on controlling the world's oil supply, get rich, and further develop theiri nuclear program? These are all parts of the Jewish conspiracy, beware lest it come to pass. |
I thought the Arab countries were poor and oppressed? Just another contradictory statement from 'truthful'.
Anyway, No, Israel has no interest in conquering Arab land - its quite technologically, and economically successful on its own.
| quote: |
Originally posted by Truthful
CHECK OUT MERKAVA'S DEFEAT IN MY SIGNATURE!!!! |
The words of a very desperate man.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Truthful | | Haha, I'm a good man. I wish I could totally destroy you, but I dont' got time. Did you check out the Jewish massacre of Palestinians annually? Your arguments are far from convincing. I'm not desperate. I got work! Hold off your outrageous remarks one more week until after finals. Then I'll continue with more excerpts. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Merkava | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by Truthful
Haha, I'm a good man. I wish I could totally destroy you, but I dont' got time. Did you check out the Jewish massacre of Palestinians annually? Your arguments are far from convincing. I'm not desperate. I got work! Hold off your outrageous remarks one more week until after finals. Then I'll continue with more excerpts. |
All bark no bite (no argument, either!). http://forums.offtopic.com/images/smilies/metallicblue.gif
Go ahead, mention "Jewish massacre of Palsetinians". Im ready to debunk it - any time.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Truthful | | Are you frustrated? If we were speaking face to face, I would have probably had you throwing punches at me. Anyhow, I've already laid bare your deception for all the world to see.
CHECK OUT MY SIGNATURE!!!!
AND FOR MERKAVA'S PLEASURE
CHECK IT OUT AGAIN!!!! | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Dragonhalitosis | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by Merkava
The ottoman empire lost claim to the land, and its new conqueres decided to split it into a part Arab, Part Jewish community. The arabs didnt accept this, claimed war on the Jews, and lost!
This was 50 years ago! Are you suggesting the Transfer of Six million Jews out of Israel? Those "illegally smuggled" Jews were running from the Persecuation of Europe and the anti-Jewish economic legislation in Poland.
Now explain this to me - why was Jewish immigration illegal, whereas Arab immigration (which was just as high as the Jewish one) was perfectly Legal ?
The Jewish population increased by 470,000 between World War I and World War II, while the non-Jewish population rose by 588,000.13 In fact, the permanent Arab population increased 120 percent between 1922 and 1947.
This rapid growth was a result of several factors. One was immigration from neighboring states — constituting 37 percent of the total immigration to pre-state Israel — by Arabs who wanted to take advantage of the higher standard of living the Jews had made possible.15 The Arab population also grew because of the improved living conditions created by the Jews as they drained malarial swamps and brought improved sanitation and health care to the region. Thus, for example, the Muslim infant mortality rate fell from 201 per thousand in 1925 to 94 per thousand in 1945 and life expectancy rose from 37 years in 1926 to 49 in 1943.
The Arab population increased the most in cities where large Jewish populations had created new economic opportunities. From 1922-1947, the non-Jewish population increased 290 percent in Haifa, 131 percent in Jerusalem and 158 percent in Jaffa. The growth in Arab towns was more modest: 42 percent in Nablus, 78 percent in Jenin and 37 percent in Bethlehem. |
[/B]
Once again we have the pathetic old fraud of Palestinian Migration raising its head a myth thats only believd by ignorant Americans in 1890 there were 550,000 Palestinians, in 1914 there were 738,000 by 1946 theerre were an estimated 1,300, 000 this is in line with natural growth ! In other words so called Palestinian immigration was only able to produce as many Palestinians as there would have been natuarally had there been no immigration.
| quote: |
| [/B]"Palestine proper has already its inhabitants. The pashalik of Jerusalem is already twice as thickly populated as the United States, having fifty-two souls to the square mile, and not 25% of them Jews ..... [We] must be prepared either to drive out by the sword the [Arab] tribes in possession as our forefathers did or to grapple with the problem of a large alien population, mostly Mohammedan and accustomed for centuries to despise us." |
[/B] Isreal Zangwall 1905 zionist leader
So how many palestinians were rercorded as actually mifgrating to palestine?
| quote: |
| Statistics indicate that only 838 more Muslims entered Palestine than left from 1932 to 1946 |
Of course this flood of immigrants had to be enticed by Jewish prosperity Arabs being too sub human to create wealth on their own. (someone of course has neglected to tell Merkava about the Boycout of Arab labour by the Jewish Labour federation who like Mr Zangwall wanted to expell Arabs not import them.) as for the suggestion that Jews were inmproving the lot of Palestinians . Ahaad Ha 'am noted on his visit [B]
| quote: |
| ....[the Zionist pioneers believed that] the only language the Arabs understand is that of force ..... [They] behave towards the Arabs with hostility and cruelty, trespass unjustly upon their boundaries, beat them shamefully without reason and even brag about it, and nobody stands to check this contemptible and dangerous tendency." |
[/B}Palestinian mortality rates were improbvng well before the Zionist migrants started arriving en mass.
Jewish Scholars such as Benny Morris and Tom Segev Have done much to disprove the myth of Palestine being an empty land.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Merkava | | Hello Dragonhalitosis, Please supply me with a source for different Palestinian immigration numbers that I have posted. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Dragonhalitosis | | the easiet online is palestineremembered.com it also relies heavily on and references too Jewish scholars Few of them pro Arab. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Merkava | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by Dragonhalitosis
the easiet online is palestineremembered.com it also relies heavily on and references too Jewish scholars Few of them pro Arab. |
Thank you for the link - there are many interesting articles and pictures there .
my source is http://www.us-israel.org/jsource/index.html
I still cant find any figures of immigration on that site though...
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Edward Teach | |
| quote: |
| Following World War II, the British withdrew from their mandate of Palestine, and the UN partitioned the area into Arab and Jewish states, an arrangement rejected by the Arabs. Subsequently, the Israelis defeated the Arabs in a series of wars without ending the deep tensions between the two sides. The territories occupied by Israel since the 1967 war are not included in the Israel country profile, unless otherwise noted. On 25 April 1982, Israel withdrew from the Sinai pursuant to the 1979 Israel-Egypt Peace Treaty. Outstanding territorial and other disputes with Jordan were resolved in the 26 October 1994 Israel-Jordan Treaty of Peace. In addition, on 25 May 2000, Israel withdrew unilaterally from southern Lebanon, which it had occupied since 1982. In keeping with the framework established at the Madrid Conference in October 1991, bilateral negotiations were conducted between Israel and Palestinian representatives (from the Israeli-occupied West Bank and Gaza Strip) and Syria to achieve a permanent settlement. But progress toward a permanent status agreement has been undermined by the outbreak of Palestinian-Israeli violence since September 2000. |
ref: CIA World Factbook
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Kookaburra | |
| quote: |
Truthful said this in post #9 :
The Jews deserved a land to call their own? Why did it happen to be in the Kingdom of David? |
Wasn't it the land given to them in a covenant to Abraham? One that brought about a curse to whomever tries to divide the land and take it away from them?
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Dragonhalitosis | | the only persons you can mean who devided and took the land away from the Jews were the Romans. the man who put down the Jewish revolt became emporer as did his son. the Roman Empire endured for several hundred more years it seems a very odd curse. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: wakeupUSA | | truthful...im glad that you brought up all these truth and facts...indeed.most americans have been fooled...thinking that Israel is their friend...these zionist are really planning to take over the world..every news channel you watch...its mostly all the jews they interview...it looks like they have all these high powered positions..
so come on america...stop being a moron and wake up!
american are dying left and right every day in IRAQ...while the israelis are enjoying coffee in a cafe in Haifa..
why are the israelis killing the palestinans day and night when it was the europeans who massacred them??????
for those of you...who does not like to read long boring history...let me give you a simple analogy..the problem the palestians are facing is equivalent to somebody taking over your house...stay in your house, then oppress you...telling you when you can cook, eat, crap, have sex..tell me how would you feel..
the palestinans were kind enough to let the jews on their land and instead of being gratefulll...look what happen now...so does it pay to be kind?
i salute the good rabbis in new york who are fighting justice for the Palestinans...they are fighting for a Palestine state..with the return of the refugees and that israel should be dissolved..
by the way..we never recognise it as israel..its OCCUPIED PALESTINE..
dont belive whatever you hear from these zionist controlled media...they are very good at lying and manipulating..soon they will even change the scripture of the bible and claim that it was muslims who killed jesus..
May the curse of GOD indeed fall on the liars and the oppressors!
i | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: antizionist2004 | | Good post wakeupusa (although i think you went a bit extreme wen u sed the zionists will change the bible and claim it was the muslims who killed jesus - cz it werent the jews, it were the romans, remember that) - however i completely agree with your point that the palestinians actually HELPED the jews illegally smuggle in their land in 1947, allowing them to live in Palestine. Were the jews grateful? Well, let's see - they took over their land, oppressing them, and placing them in refugee camps. | | Reply To this Message
|
Israel & Palestine Forum: THE WHOLE HISTORY OF jews AND ISRAEL AND PALESTINE
|