Will he buy his way out of this one ? |
| Posted by: miktrant | | surely MJ can no longer avoid justice with huge lumps of cash,
I think this one will be the final nail in the coffin.
they must have some pretty substantial evidence to issue
a arrest warrant this time,
but in saying that I cant help but remember the O.J case | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: chelktty | | I think he'll flee the country. He might initially turn himself in but after he posts bail, once he knows what he's up against and figures out that he can't buy his way out of this, I think he'll hop on his private jet and haul a$$ to France like Roman Polanski. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: ben1fan | | I agree chelktty. He was just taken into custody and will be out probably before sunset. They say he has to turn in his passport, but we are talking Michael Jackson here, and I dont see Europe turning him away. He is still very big in Europe and China. I am listening to Jermaine Jackson right now, he just said ****ing on CNN! The family supports him. Wow Jermaine is pissed. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Lawless | | Yes, but he IS Michael Jackson. If he runs, he really can't hide. He is too well known. Unless, he gets plastic surgery. Oh wait, he has already done that... A LOT! Guess that won't help!  | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: schmiggens | | I agree, yes he can flkee the coutry, but where is going to go? Unless he lives in a cave somewhere remote, he can't hide. I would say he has the most recognisable face in the world.
He posted bail in one hour, so he mustn'; be short of cash like someone said. I heard he was going to file for bankruptcy? He may just buy his way out of it.
God wouldn't it be intesretsing though if he actually did go to jail.
"Michael, meet your cell mate for the nexy 50 years - Big Bubba". | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: RBGraams44 | | how can he lose with the lawyer he has!! tsking the Pederson case. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: chodder | | its sad that famous people have speacial privelages. they should be treated just like anybody else. if some blue coller regular joe was accused of sleeping with kids the cops would have busted his door down. with michael jackson they let him surrender when he "wants" to. who else thinks everybody should be "equal" and tried the same as everybody else. isnt this said somewhere in the constitution? | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Lawless | | That's what I've been saying, chodder. Because he is MJ, he get's star treatment, even though he's been accused of something so heinous. If this was the average joe, he would be sitting at the police station, not making the bail that was set. I don't think that it's fair at all. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: chelktty | | I agree with both of you, it's not fair that superstars get favorable treatment. To get processed out of jail takes HOURS not 1 hour for average citizens. But like the new saying goes, with the right amount of money, you can get away with murder. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Senator | | By the way.... OJ Simpson was allowed to have a personal chef cook for him while he was in jail. He even had satillite television in his cell. My jaw dropped when I saw that on the news. Un-f*cking-believable! | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Lawless | | That's because if you're a celebrity... even commiting a crime means nothing.
We give them star treatment... even if the gun was found in their hand, and the blood spats on their clothes. There is no such thing as guilty. We pamper these Hollywood kings and queens because of who they are!
What a load of crap... | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: schmiggens | | We say that so often about celebritys' "They get away with everything". But Winona Ryder got reasonably fair treatment for that shop-lifting stuff, normal everyday treatment, you know.
A lot of celebs have gone to jail, and have gotton "normal" sentences, it is just the ones who get away with it that we remember.
Also I think it is money that matters, not fame, you can be non-famous and have lots of money and probably get away with it too. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: ben1fan | | No I dont think that is true. As much stuff as she stole in most states she would have done a little time. Plus the crimes that O.J. and Michael are accused of are way worse than shoplifting. I am not saying that either one are guilty, but lets be fair in the treatment of all people. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: ozmale | | The DA locked the buy-out escape-hatch some time ago when they changed the law, and you can bet that they made pretty sure the family was not thinking of going that route prior to even putting pen to paper in the search and arrest affadavits. They would have done everything conceivable to ensure that what happened last time does not happen again. That's not to say it won't, but it is highly unlikely. I don't think this will be a '93 or OJ repeat. It is going to become a hideous monster for MJ of a particularly new and nasty kind - one that is very hard to defeat even for the rich and famous. However if he has done this, then that monster should rightfully devour him. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: one and only | | Schmiggens, since I don't waste major time with minor people, I'll just ignore you. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: chelktty | | Schmiggens! I bet you're heartbroken over being ignored eh? I on the other had thought it was funny!
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: mystic | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by chelktty
Schmiggens! I bet you're heartbroken over being ignored eh? I on the other had thought it was funny! |
Schmiggens, count me in with Chel. It was very funny! 
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: gaboman | | Seriously, if I found the guy who made calling someone "hater" fine, as long as they don't agree with you, I swear I'd give him... an ear full...
Hmm... wait a minute, calling someone a hater is hating too... therefore someone who calls a person a hater is a "hater" themselves...
One word comes to mind: Hypocrit.
Yeah, don't beat yourself up schmiggens  | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Lawless | | Exactly, Grant... someone that wants to be a hater on people, calling them haters, is NOTHING other than a hypocrite!!!!
That would be like someone coming in a thread and *****ing at people about being so pro-violence, and screaming at them about how violent they are and saying that you would kick their @sses, etc...  | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Lawless | | If you want to read the off topic "crap," it's been moved to the Flamers Ward, where it belongs! | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: mystic | | Okay...Ill have to repeat myself again then.
If MJ buys his way out of this one (financially speaking)....that will make me wonder even more...kind of like how he bought his way out of the first one.
People who are innocent usually fight it in court...they dont just pay people to be quiet.....
I wouldnt pay someone off if I were innocent.....and I wouldnt offer them another life in another country....
Thats a true sign of guilt in my eyes....but thats just my opinion. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Lawless | | I have to say that I agree with you about that, mystic.
If I was guilty... I would go down in flames to prove my innocence.
How the law just allowed him to pay off someone, for those charges is beyond me. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: gaboman | | hmm... I don't know, people pay to make problems go away, if the problem is a person lying for financial gain, perhaps money is the only thing that'll make them back down... otherwise, you could be a lot worse off...
but I don't know. After all, I've never owned a beatles song, nor have I been accused of a crime... erm... recently  | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Larke2000 | | i don't think he'll buy his way out of this one. but you know if michael jackson gets put in prison all we'll hear about for months is that it's just the white man trying to keep a white woman down.  | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Lawless | | Larke, you crack me up, time and time again!
If he IS guilty and can't buy his way out of this one... I can't see MJ surviving prison. I KNOW that they wouldn't put him in general population. But, prison would kill him. UNLESS, he get's star treatment in there too!!!
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: mystic | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by gaboman
hmm... I don't know, people pay to make problems go away, if the problem is a person lying for financial gain, perhaps money is the only thing that'll make them back down... otherwise, you could be a lot worse off...
but I don't know. After all, I've never owned a beatles song, nor have I been accused of a crime... erm... recently |
Hmmm....I remember quite well when some girl told everyone that she was Bill Cosby's daughter.....he didnt pay them off like they were wanting, in fact, he went out of his way to PROVE that she wasnt his daughter, and then the law charged her and her mother of attempted extortion (or something like that)....
Why would you just not fight it if it were false....that way, when MJ proved he was wronged, people might give him the benefit of the doubt....but because he paid off the first people...one has to wonder....
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Lawless | | Sooooooooooooo right. I completely forgot about that thing with Bill Cosby. But, he DID fight it, and proved what they were doing. If I was MJ, I would have spent that money (that he paid off that family with 10 years ago) and instead of giving it to them, I would have made that money go to the best investigators, and lawyers, and I would have fought that thing, tooth and nail. His name was ruined because of all that stuff years ago, and he will always look guilty for paying them off. Even if he didn't do it. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: fuscia | | I agree Kris. You have to fight and prove them wrong. Settling only makes you look guilty. It does not help that he still is doing the sleepovers with kids. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Ken NJ | | So what is the truth about Jacko's molestation? Is it really true when famous, he will pay $20 M to just get it behind him even if it was false? Do you pay minor fines instead of fighting city hall? What's relative value of $15 million plus contingent attorney fees for scoring a lottery against a celebrity worth several hundred million? And if the secretary was making say $40K a year working for the lawyer and later being fired, she goes and writes A book to report what went behind the molestation complaint. <---Just Click Here
| quote: |
Tuesday, November 25, 2003 -By Roger Friedman
http://www.foxnews.com/images/banners/logo03.gif A legal secretary who was peripherally involved in the first child molestation case concerning Michael Jackson says he was framed.
Geraldine Hughes worked for attorney Barry Rothman in 1993. Rothman represented dentist Evan Chandler in his divorce from his wife, June. Hughes said allegations against Jackson of child molestation arose from a bitter custody dispute between the Chandlers over their then 12-year-old son. Hughes, who kept a daily-annotated calendar during her time with Rothman, told me today in an exclusive interview that among her revelations is the story of a memo between the attorney and Chandler.
“Rothman advised the father how to report child abuse via a third party rather than going directly to the police," she said. "If it were any other case, you’d just pick up the phone and call the police.” But no trial ever occurred, as Jackson wound up paying a reported settlement of $20 million to the Chandlers. Hughes — who was fired by Rothman after about six months — claimed the plan to involve Jackson in the Chandlers’ divorce was an “elaborate” one. “You’ve got to see the whole plan,” she said. She claimed, for example, that almost none of the Chandler case was recorded, that very little correspondence exists and that most everything transpired behind closed doors with no secretary present to take notes. Nevertheless, a pattern of unusual activities emerged in the case, she said. |
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: pizie | | I find it so interesting that now that Black people have enough money to hire the best legal minds, people are angry, complaing, etc. I remember when it was the other way around only the white people didnt need alot of money to get off scott free. I remember black men being lynched for looking at a white woman or being murdered just for being black and the person got off. Civil Rights leader murdered and black people had to just live with the outcome. Now Black people are playing the same game as White people and some not all are crying foul. White people murder Black people all the time and how many have gotten the death penalty? maybe 1 or 2? Please, if this were Tom Cruise or Ben Afleck, the same would apply to them as the people you are complaing about.
Peace | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Ken NJ | | Playing the race card again? The Jacko case doesn't need it to win over the dumb prosecution Sneddon. The Santa Barbera DA will fall on own sword. It's becoming more transparent the Jacko case is less and less about molestation evidence, but more about prosecutorial revenge, post-retirement enrichments, book royalties, public speaking and personal fame. Certainly doesn't look like a good faith prosecution. Bad case make bad case laws. | | Reply To this Message
|
Michael Jackson Forum: Will he buy his way out of this one ?
|