Is Saddam Hussein Alive or Dead? |
| Posted by: Dreamzwalker | | After the bombing of military installations in Baghdad - many people are wondering: Is Saddam Alive or Dead?
Voice your opinion
Personally, I'm not sure - but I could see him Fleeing to recollect himself. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Edward Teach | | Saddam likes the TV, I think if he were alive we would have seen more of him. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: bsenka | | It's certainly suspicious that he hasn't appeared on TV yet, but I doubt that he was hit. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Dreamzwalker | | one never knows but his body should be seen before they say "he's a gonner." | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Edward Teach | | An eyewitness said that he saw Saddam being brought out of the building on a stretcher and he was on o2. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: debrabsg | | If he's dead, they are keeping it from his own troops. They would not continue fighting, we could move into Baghdad and set the next phase in motion.
If he's hurt, he doesn't want us to see how bad.
If he's alive and unhurt, not letting us know is pretty darn smart. Our expectations might be affected, and he could take advantage. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Marc Flemming | | Saddam Praises Commander Who Surrendered Early in War - Vague speech on TV adds to speculation about state of his health
In an appearance that will only stir the debate over his fate, Saddam Hussein turned up on Iraq’s state-run television Monday to urge Iraqis to “kill your enemy precisely and accurately.” But he was vague in describing the U.S.-led military campaign aimed at toppling him from power and said nothing that would establish the precise time the tape was made.
WEARING A MILITARY uniform but without the glasses worn in his last apparent appearance on television on Friday, Saddam seemed more robust and rested as he exhorted Iraqi citizens and soldiers to fight the allied invaders.
“You are ordered by Allah ... hit them above the necks and cut (off) all the heads,” he said, according to an MSNBC TV translator.
Taunting the allies, he asked: “Have you found what the devil that besets your soul promised you in Iraq?”
But Saddam discussed the war mainly in general terms during his 20-plus minute address, renewing debate about his health that came after his first televised speech last week.
He referred to successes in Umm Qasr, the southern port where sporadic fighting was reported Sunday.
He also said “victory is very near” in Basra, southern Iraq, which U.S. and British tank units were still trying to secure. And he called on defenders of Baghdad and the northern city of Mosul to hold firm, saying “despicable enemies would be defeated.”
He also referred to the ground invasion.
“Those who are believers will be victorious,” he said. “In these decisive days, the enemy tried not using missiles and fighter jets as they did before. This time, they sent their infantry troops. This time, they have come to invade and occupy your land.”
But he made no mention of the capture of American POWs on Sunday near Nasiriyah, which was broadcast by the state-run television.
CANNED SADDAM?
And when he cited several units and commanders, saluting them “for their heroic feats in the battlefield,” he named the commander of the 11th Iraqi Brigade in Basra, who surrendered along with many of his troops in the early hours of the war. That prompted officials at the allied Central Command in Qatar to conclude that the tape was likely recorded before the beginning of the hostilities.
White House spokesman Ari Fleischer said nothing in Saddam’s Monday speech proved it had been made since the beginning of the war.
“I think there are some doubts about whether that tape is canned or was fresh based on recent events,” Fleischer said. “It would not be a surprise if Saddam Hussein had some time ago put in the can numerous statements designed to be released later.”
U.S. officials who spoke on the condition of anonymity said Saddam would have to make a specific reference to a recent event to prove he’s alive.
Officials say it is highly unlikely Saddam would use a double to give a speech; the Iraqis know such a ruse would probably be detected. Look-alikes, officials said, are more useful in motorcades and similar functions that don’t require public speaking.
British Defense Secretary Geoff Hoon came to a similar conclusion in a briefing on Monday.
“As far as the pictures this morning are concerned, obviously analysis continues. But what I can say straight away is that those pictures were not live,” he told a London news conference.
Hoon added that Saddam’s health made no difference to the military campaign.
QUESTIONS OVER SADDAM’S HEALTH
The Iraqi leader’s health and whereabouts have been the subject of much conjecture since the U.S. military launched a surprise air strike on a private home on the outskirts of Baghdad early Thursday.
Some U.S. officials initially expressed optimism that Saddam had been killed in the attack, which used so-called “bunker buster” bombs to penetrate a special reinforced bunker beneath the home where the Iraqi leader was believed to be sleeping with other members of the regime’s leadership, possibly including his sons, Odai and Qusai.
The appearance of a videotape of Saddam broadcast the day after the attack did little to quell the speculation, with U.S. intelligence officials questioning whether the tape was a “canned” appearance recorded before the attack, or even whether the speaker was Saddam or a “double”?
After it was determined that the voice on the tape belonged to Saddam, most U.S. officials indicated that he had been injured in the attack, though to what degree no one could say.
Iraqi state television reported Saturday that Saddam had praised the performance of Iraqi soldiers in the face of invading forces.
“The president expressed his satisfaction at the performance of the Iraqi army and members of the Baath Party and Iraqi tribes,” the television said.
It showed pictures of Saddam in two separate meetings — one with his powerful younger son, Qusai; Deputy Prime Minister Tariq Aziz; and Vice President Taha Yassin Ramadan, and another meeting with Qusai and Defense Minister General Sultan Hashim Ahmed.
The announcer said the meetings took place on Saturday, but that could not be confirmed.
Source: MSNBC/AP | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Joki | | Saddam spent millions for bunkers.
He made bunkers only for himself and then bunkers for war combats, like command posts etc.
These bunkers were made by German and Ex Yugoslav generals and their companies.
These bunkers can stand an atomic explosion od 20 kilotons.
And if you want to hit one of the bunkers, the bomb has to go in 90 degree angle, because bunkers outside underneath the ground is round, the bomb would just bounce, it would not make direct impact.
Now, do you think he was waiting for bombs? Do you think he was surprised by an attack. I personally do not.
I think he is alive and in good condition. It will take soldiers that will go to Iraq to kill him or improson him, not any kind of other weapon, not even an atomic bomb.
We also have to say that he has food for 6 months in these bunkers
Again American propaganda is getting into you. Same like propaganda that Osama Bin laden was hit and killed by an American bomb.
I personally believe that Americans will loose this war.
If they could not get Osama Bin Laden, how the heck they gonna get Saddam. It has been shown in previous wars that US soldiers are not good in combat fighting when it comes to infantry.
Take war in Korea and especially Vietnam.
I pray for poor soldiers that are going to be killed and ofcourse civilians. One of those people could be next Einstein. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Dreamzwalker | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by Joki
even an atomic bomb.
|
The radiation would probably kill him. Suits cannot stand ground Zero long before melting.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Joki | | No, they are made to withstand the ATOMIC BOMB.
So he can LIVE THERE for 6 months, no problem.
You can bomb him with 20 atomic bombs. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Sean Kelly | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by Joki
Saddam spent millions for bunkers.
He made bunkers only for himself and then bunkers for war combats, like command posts etc.
These bunkers were made by German and Ex Yugoslav generals and their companies.
These bunkers can stand an atomic explosion od 20 kilotons.
And if you want to hit one of the bunkers, the bomb has to go in 90 degree angle, because bunkers outside underneath the ground is round, the bomb would just bounce, it would not make direct impact.
|
Are you high, or do you just have no clue about atomic weapons?
First of all, 20 kilotons is a fart in the wind compared to the megaton weapons we sport today. Can you even comprehend the difference in power between a kiloton and megaton weapon? Multi-kiloton weapons flattened Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Had MEGAton weapons been used there, those places would be yacht harbors today.
Second, nuclear bombs don't slam into the earth so that they can "bounce" off of round surfaces (this is an astonishingly ignorant assertation). They are detonated above ground before impact so as to direct their force into and along the surface rather than deflect a significant amount of force upward.
Holy moley, I don't even want to take that much further.
Let's just say that if we knew which bunker he was in, he'd be toast.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: iudoe | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by Dreamzwalker
After the bombing of military installations in Baghdad - many people are wondering: Is Saddam Alive or Dead?
Voice your opinion
Personally, I'm not sure - but I could see him Fleeing to recollect himself. |
Is that similar to finding himself?
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Joki | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by Sean Kelly
Are you high, or do you just have no clue about atomic weapons?
First of all, 20 kilotons is a fart in the wind compared to the megaton weapons we sport today. Can you even comprehend the difference in power between a kiloton and megaton weapon? Multi-kiloton weapons flattened Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Had MEGAton weapons been used there, those places would be yacht harbors today.
Second, nuclear bombs don't slam into the earth so that they can "bounce" off of round surfaces (this is an astonishingly ignorant assertation). They are detonated above ground before impact so as to direct their force into and along the surface rather than deflect a significant amount of force upward.
Holy moley, I don't even want to take that much further.
Let's just say that if we knew which bunker he was in, he'd be toast. |
My personal appoligy for that little mistake. I meant to say megaton.
20 megaton.
You americans use nuclear weapon in Iraq, the whole world will attack you. Remember that.
And just cuz of that particular reason atomic bomb can not do anything to him. YOU HAVE NO BOMBS THAT CAN DO ANYTHING TO HIM.
stop being so American ignorant.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Sean Kelly | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by Joki
YOU HAVE NO BOMBS THAT CAN DO ANYTHING TO HIM.
|
If he wants to hide in his hole while the country is liberated, we'll just pave over him with an asphalt parkinglot for the DisneyWorld Iraq Adventure Park and he can stay down there and turn to dust. Fine by me.
Do you have ANY point other than that you wish 100million people would "wake up" and get their "head out of the sand" and stop being so ignorant? Say something worth consideration or give it a rest. 
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Marc Flemming | | US Intelligence reported today that they believe Saddam is very alive and issuing orders to his troops. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Edward Teach | | Yes and they think that it was his son Qusay that was brought out on a stretcher after the bombinb. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Dreamzwalker | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by Joki
You americans use nuclear weapon in Iraq, the whole world will attack you. Remember that.
And just cuz of that particular reason atomic bomb can not do anything to him. YOU HAVE NO BOMBS THAT CAN DO ANYTHING TO HIM.
stop being so American ignorant. |
We do not need to use Nuclear weapons to have the same impact - we have newer weapons to cause similar effects.
Good luck if anyone tries to invade us. Win or lose - Americans would fight to the death. Look at our civil war.
I had a great great GrandFather on the south...and the north...
brothers, fathers, and cousins killed each other (same with other countries civil wars i know), but look at how hard we attacked each other. This was the bloodiest battle in ALL of the American wars - just think of what would happen to a stranger.
I would estimate that nearly 80 percent of America would have to be killed in order to win the battle.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Diogenes | | This thread is a joke--so much tittle-tattle conjecture. Do you guys have your knitting with you? One or two of you could end up becoming president of the USofA. Hey! Wait a minute--let's watch the grass grow! | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Dreamzwalker | | Right - you have been warned about insults and asked to end it.
STOP with the insults | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Husker | |
Yoki - Joki or whatever you go by.........should us Americans be shaking in our boots because we're 'American ignorant' I'll be worried all weekend because Joki has warned me....Saddam will get us no matter what we do.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Joki | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by Dreamzwalker
We do not need to use Nuclear weapons to have the same impact - we have newer weapons to cause similar effects.
Good luck if anyone tries to invade us. Win or lose - Americans would fight to the death. Look at our civil war.
I had a great great GrandFather on the south...and the north...
brothers, fathers, and cousins killed each other (same with other countries civil wars i know), but look at how hard we attacked each other. This was the bloodiest battle in ALL of the American wars - just think of what would happen to a stranger.
I would estimate that nearly 80 percent of America would have to be killed in order to win the battle. |
You need troops to go to the city and take it. You can not take Iraq with only bombing. Honestly your troops are paid, therefore they do not have heart. Most of your soldiers dont even know why are they in Iraq. Same thing like Vietnam.
Everyone is good on their own ground. Watch Vietnamese, at that time you had more weapons same like now with IRaq, but you still couldnt do ****. Because you had no clue why u there. U were scared.
I am just mad at your president, and ofcourse you people that support that texas cowboy. ANd remember, no world power lasted forever.
Like i said, learn the history. And please come to the ground, you aint ****.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Husker | |
I am just mad at your president, and ofcourse you people that support that texas cowboy. ANd remember, no world power lasted forever.
Like i said, learn the history. And please come to the ground, you aint ****. [/B][/QUOTE]
Yoki - Joki
Explain that last line to me Joki-Yoki. It might help me understand your apparent lack of active brain cells if you had the balls to put your location on your profile. 
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Diogenes | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by Dreamzwalker
Right - you have been warned about insults and asked to end it.
STOP with the insults |
Tell you something Dreamzwalker, this website's tedious and you sound like a BIG GIRL'S BLOUSE, flouncing about in your petty outrage. There's a dirty, illegal war murdering women and children going on and because of your moronic leader I have to help pay for it with my taxes. Go and enlist as one of those not-so-smart-bombs that go astray and kill innocent people--you could bull**** all of Iraq into complete stupidity with your fall-out.
TRY A THREAD ABOUT "SHOULD BUSH AND BLAIR BE TRIED THROUGH THE INTERNATIONAL COURT FOR WAR CRIMES?" or "IS TAKING OUT A REGIME AMERICA NO LONGER LIKES---A CONTRACT KILLING?" Remember it's all propagada and psychology now--the Pentagon said so. So you'll have a lot of fun feeding on the crap your president spoons you. And boy--hasn't the world learnt a lot about American foreign policy. (That's what is called rhetorical--it doesn't need an answer). 
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Rambo | |
| quote: |
| SHOULD BUSH AND BLAIR BE TRIED THROUGH THE INTERNATIONAL COURT FOR WAR CRIMES? |
No.
| quote: |
| IS TAKING OUT A REGIME AMERICA NO LONGER LIKES---A CONTRACT KILLING? |
No.
| quote: |
| There's a dirty, illegal war murdering women and children going on. |
Yes, that would be Suddam Hussein and his inept ninja battalion of brutal **** wimps.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Edward Teach | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by Diogenes
Tell you something Dreamzwalker, this website's tedious and you sound like a BIG GIRL'S BLOUSE, flouncing about in your petty outrage. There's a dirty, illegal war murdering women and children going on and because of your moronic leader I have to help pay for it with my taxes. Go and enlist as one of those not-so-smart-bombs that go astray and kill innocent people--you could bull**** all of Iraq into complete stupidity with your fall-out.
TRY A THREAD ABOUT "SHOULD BUSH AND BLAIR BE TRIED THROUGH THE INTERNATIONAL COURT FOR WAR CRIMES?" or "IS TAKING OUT A REGIME AMERICA NO LONGER LIKES---A CONTRACT KILLING?" Remember it's all propagada and psychology now--the Pentagon said so. So you'll have a lot of fun feeding on the crap your president spoons you. And boy--hasn't the world learnt a lot about American foreign policy. (That's what is called rhetorical--it doesn't need an answer). |
It's a shame that you can't post a quality reply without throwing out inuslts. This is a very good forum and we try to make it enjoyable for everyone. In case you haven't noticed people aren't lowering themselves to your standards and that is a good thing. I would suggest that you raise yours to the level of the other great individuals on this forum.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Edward Teach | | We may have seen a clue as to the fate of Saddam Hussein in the past day or two. I'm sure that everyone remembers that Saddam always has a bodyguard who stands behind him when he is speaking especially in the most recent images prior to the war.
The first image of Saddam after the bombing did not have that guard standing behind him and the image of he and his ministers sitting around the table did not have that guard standing behind him. Which leads us to think the those images were made long in the past.
Now in the latest image where the Vice President is pictured with the Minister of Defence we see Saddams bodyguard standing behind them.
WHY?
Because I believe the Saddam is either dead or severely incapacitated. My guess is that he is dead and now that bodyguard has sworn his allegiance to the Vice President. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Diogenes | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by Ron Ackerman
It's a shame that you can't post a quality reply without throwing out inuslts. This is a very good forum and we try to make it enjoyable for everyone. In case you haven't noticed people aren't lowering themselves to your standards and that is a good thing. I would suggest that you raise yours to the level of the other great individuals on this forum. |
My God you are blinkered--I've read most of your forums and a lot of the arguments wouldn't pass third grade--but I see you give them a good star-rating if they are good 'ol boys. You really should have a bloody war in America--you would find it chastening and maybe it would sharpen your wits so that you didn't sh!t stars 'n stripes when someone like me opposes this illegal war and says America is prosecuting this illegal war for OIL and the economic domination it will get from seizing that OIL.
AMERICA IS USING ITS MILITARY TO REMOVE REGIMES LIKE CONTRACT KILLING. I hope you intelligent majority of Americans will not keep silent too long. Here's how you recognise your enemy. 
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: llangst | | What does it matter if he's toast or not.
If Saddam is toast (and I hope he is)...... another just like him or one of his annointed "royal" sons or "republican guard officers" will rise and attempt to continue.
Just like cancer......you better cut enough around the original site to be sure you've got it all! | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Sindy | | Know what i think people?
Sadam is far from dead. He's not that stupid. Bush shoul've planed his attack better, and i think that Bush and the rest of the world will be surprised of the Iraqi power. They already are-they thought this would take a week or so.
I think that Iraq has much to show yet  | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: yoyola | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by Dreamzwalker
After the bombing of military installations in Baghdad - many people are wondering: Is Saddam Alive or Dead?
Voice your opinion
Personally, I'm not sure - but I could see him Fleeing to recollect himself. |
NO, i don´t like to qoute, but i want to tell you that i am astonished to see this question combined with a request for voting.
There is war, people are dying, how can you think about voting such a question?
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Diogenes | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by yoyola
NO, i don´t like to qoute, but i want to tell you that i am astonished to see this question combined with a request for voting.
There is war, people are dying, how can you think about voting such a question? |
Das ist stimmt yoyola, diese Leute haben kein lust fur den Friede, nur die Kraft. Sie verstehen nicht der Krieg, weil sie wie die kinder sind.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Edward Teach | | Translation via Altavista
That is not is correct yoyola, these people have desire for peace, only the strength. They do not understand the war, because they are like the children. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Diogenes | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by Ron Ackerman
Translation via Altavista
That is not is correct yoyola, these people have desire for peace, only the strength. They do not understand the war, because they are like the children. |
SO what's your point--you know someone who understands German--I'm impressed. One error though--and it's important--"these people have NO desire for peace" "kein" is a negative. So if you go into a summit of UN members, make sure everyone speaks English, otherwise there could be a war!
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Edward Teach | | Even though I'm German-American I don't even know anyone who speaks German I have to rely on AltaVista Translator. I guess it doesn't translate all that well. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Marc Flemming | | Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein has called for a jihad, or holy war, against Coalition forces in Iraq.
In a statement read out on TV by Information Minister Mohammed Saeed al-Sahaf, he branded American and British forces "evil aggressors".
He said their invasion was"an aggression on the religion, the wealth, the honor and the soul and an aggression on the land of Islam.
"Jihad is a duty in confronting them. Those who are martyred will be rewarded in heaven. Seize the opportunity, my brothers."
"Hit them, fight them...fight them everywhere," he added. "Don't give them a chance to catch their breath."
The statement was issued as US forces were reported within 50 miles of Baghdad.
At the same time B-52 bombers were pounding Republican Guard positions north of Karbala.
The Iraqi leader has delivered two televised addresses since the war began on March 20, and was recently shown with his two sons, Uday and Qusay.
It was not clear why he did not deliver the latest address in person, as expected.
US Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld described Saddam's non-appearance as "interesting".
Source: Sky News | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Marc Flemming | | More....
Pentagon Keeps Asking, 'Where's Saddam?'
Pentagon officials insist they don't know whether Saddam Hussein has survived two weeks of bombing. In case he's alive, however, they appear to be trying to bait him into showing himself.
Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld started the drumbeat Sunday, saying there were unconfirmed reports that members of Saddam's family - including his first wife, the mother of his two sons - had begun to flee.
"Where is Saddam Hussein? Where is Qusai? Where is Odai - his sons? They're not talking." Rumsfeld said on "Fox News Sunday."
Then, taking a page Monday from the war in Afghanistan, his spokeswoman, Victoria Clarke, revived a statement Rumsfeld used last year on the whereabouts of al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden, who to this day eludes American forces.
"Since the coalition bombed Saddam's headquarters at the very beginning of the war, the world has neither seen his hide nor hair, only tapes," she said in her opening statement at the daily Pentagon news conference.
On Wednesday, Rumsfeld questioned aloud, in a press conference that would be broadcast to Iraqis, why Saddam had not made a recent television appearance.
"The fact that Saddam Hussein did not show up for his televised speech today is interesting," he said, referring to Iraqi Information Minister Mohammed Saeed al-Sahhaf's reading a statement in Saddam's name. The government had told television networks to be ready for a statement from Saddam.
It was unclear why al-Sahhaf delivered the address for Saddam, who has been seen on tape delivering two addresses since the war began March 20 with the bombing of the Baghdad complex.
Analysts said the repeated remarks on Saddam may also be designed to sew seeds of doubt among Iraqis and thus weaken the regime and hasten its collapse. Three Pentagon officials said privately they believe the longer Saddam remains out of the public view, the more suspicious Iraqis will become about his circumstances.
The White House also on Tuesday pointedly raised fresh doubts about Saddam's status.
"The ways that you would know (if he's alive) is if you would see him in a live broadcast," said Ari Fleischer, spokesman for President Bush. "If he was live or he showed something contemporaneous, he would speak about an event that just took place that day or the night before, then you might have information that he is alive.
"We have not seen that. ... The proof that he would be dead would be if you saw a body."
As the White House and Pentagon baited Saddam, senior U.S. officials familiar with the latest intelligence said there remains no evidence that would indicate either way: that he is dead, or he is alive.
Source: AP | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: yoyola | | [QUOTE]Originally posted by Diogenes
[B]
Thank you for this important correction.
Much more aprehensioning if they are like little children. As far as i know little children don´t play with bombs.
Question:
In this forum i see the voting FOR or AGAINST the iraq war (this type of voting i can accept). Its 49% to 45% to 6%, so nearly 50/50. In germany we hear that nearly 75% of the americans ar FOR this war. What do you think is more true? | | Reply To this Message
|
Post-9/11 Era Forum: Is Saddam Hussein Alive or Dead?
|